This NOAA site will no longer provide GOES-East imagery. For access to high resolution GOES-East imagery from GOES-16, please go to the site: https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES/index.php. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. |

## Implementation of Midnight Blackbody Calibration Correction (MBCC)
## I. IntroductionAt certain times of the year, the magnitudes of the computed calibration slopes for the GOES Imagers' infrared channels exhibit anomalous dips during the approximately eight hours centered on satellite midnight. The amplitudes of the dips usually decrease with increasing wavelength. For GOES-8, the anomalous dips occurred during the months between April and October. However, GOES-10 experiences this phenomenon all year round. GOES-12, which became operational April 1, 2003, has so far exhibited the effect all the time, but we do not know whether it will continue year-round. (Data collected during post-launch checkout in the fall of 2001 also exhibited the effect.) A complete discussion of this effect and an earlier version of the algorithm to correct for it is contained in Johnson and Weinreb (1996). We believe these dips are errors in the slope computations, for two reasons. First, studies by the University of Wisconsin correlate the dip with errors--of the order of 1 K-- in the measurement of ocean surface temperatures. We also have seen other reports, both informal and in the scientific literature, of anomalous observations around midnight. In addition, such errors in computed slopes were predicted in 1988 by ITT (Annable, 1988), the Imagers' manufacturer. By analysis of the instrument's design, Annable showed that radiation from the Image Navigation and Registration (INR) sunshields in the imager's scan cavity, which can reach temperatures up to 350K, could be reflected by the imager's internal blackbody to its detectors during the blackbody sequence. The extraneous radiation from the sunshields would cause slope errors with characteristics similar to the dips we see in orbit. The midnight blackbody calibration correction (MBCC) algorithm, a modification of the algorithm presented in Johnson and Weinreb (1996), will be implemented in processing in the Sensor Processing System (SPS) at the Wallops Command and Data Acquisition Station (WCDAS) to correct the calibration slopes. A description of the MBCC algorithm follows. Shown in Fig. 1 is an example of how the MBCC algorithm improves the calibration by reducing the magnitudes of the dips around midnight.
## II. Midnight Algorithm in the SPS at WCDAS
The GOES ground processing system uses Imager observations of space
and its internal blackbody to determine the calibration slope, represented
by the coefficient
where In the MBCC algorithm, most steps will involve the responsivity rather
than the calibration slope. The responsivity
where m. Because of the relationship expressed in Eq. (2), the slope
and the responsivity are equivalent, i.e., whenever we know one, we know
the other.At each blackbody sequence, the SPS will perform a quadratic regression to generate the polynomial coefficients relating the responsivity to the temperature of one of the Imager's optical components, using a dependent sample of optics temperatures and slopes (and responsivities calculated from them) collected over previous days. The dependent sample will exclude the data from the hours around midnight, since they may be erroneous. The SPS will then compare the responsivity associated with the slope calculated by the normal techniques (the "original" responsivity) with a responsivity estimated from the optics temperatures. If the original and estimated responsivities are in agreement, the original slope will be deemed to be correct, and the SPS will use it in further processing. If the two responsivities disagree, it is assumed that radiation from the INR sunshields corrupted the original slope computation, so the SPS will compute a slope from the estimated responsivity and use that in further processing. When the MBCC algorithm becomes operational, it will be used for all the Imager IR detectors at each blackbody sequence, and it will be used all the time, not only near midnight. As long as the responsivities associated with the original slopes are reasonable, the original slopes will be accepted and applied to transform the detector pixel outputs to radiances, as in that case the original responsivities will agree with the estimates. On the other hand, should the midnight effect, or a random noise spike at any time of day, corrupt a computed slope, the SPS will replace it with a slope computed from the estimated responsivity, which should be closer to the truth. In that way, the compensating algorithm will be beneficial even during the day, when the slope-dips are not expected to occur.
The regression will generate the coefficients r will
be obtained as a quadratic in the temperature ^{est}T of one of the instrument's
optics components:
where The regression will also generate the standard errors of estimate, The regression will be performed at every blackbody sequence and will be done separately for each detector. The dependent sample of data for the regression will be obtained from
the existing SPS 10-day history file. This file contains slopes and optics
temperatures sampled once every blackbody sequence (usually once every
30 minutes). The slopes in this file are those computed by the technique
described at the beginning of this section, i.e., a quadratic calibration
modified to account for the polarization-induced change of the scan mirror's
reflectivity with east-west scan angle. However, these slopes are not filtered
to reduce noise, i.e., they are computed in mode 1, not mode 3, and so
they are represented by r, which
in the dependent sample will be calculated from _{1}m for
the particular detector by Eq. (2)._{1}The dependent sample will exclude data from the period from midnight
minus The regression will be performed with data from the current day and
the previous The optics temperature and responsivities in the regression will be
quality controlled. Optics temperatures outside a specified range of temperatures
will be eliminated. The upper and lower temperature thresholds for the
predictor optics temperature will be the limits provided in the factory
database. Before doing the regression, the SPS will compute the mean
At each blackbody sequence, the slope will be computed as usual, including
correction for the polarization-induced change of the scan mirror's reflectivity
with east-west scan angle, and, if currently operational, the filtering
to reduce noise (mode 3). This is the original slope. At the same time,
however, the SPS will also use the unfiltered slope r
by Eq. (2)._{1}At each blackbody sequence, after the regression coefficients have been
determined as described above, the estimated mode-1 responsivity For each detector, the difference Ns,
where s is the standard error of estimate of the responsivity (see discussion
following Eq. [3]), and N is an operator-selectable integer (a separate
value for each channel), then the original slope will be used in further
processing. If the difference is greater than Ns, then the slope
associated with the estimated mode-1 responsivity will be computed as
This slope will be used in all further processing until the next calibration.
If mode 1 is the operational calibration mode, then m will be filtered before being used._{1}^{est}The midnight algorithm cannot be used until For each detector, a flag indicating whether the midnight algorithm is active or not at each blackbody sequence will be included in the SPS 10-day history file. However, these flags will not be transmitted in GVAR, stored in the RPM short-term blackbody history file, or printed out with the contents of that file in response to the PRINT SHORT BBCAL command. ## III. REFERENCESAnnable, R., Redesign of INR Sunshields (Imager) to Reduce In-Flight
Calibration Errors. Johnson, J. Outline of OGE Midnight Correction Procedure (Revised), private communication, March 25, 1997, 5pp. Johnson, R.X., and M.P. Weinreb, 1996: GOES-8 Imager Midnight Effects
and Slope Correction. In Weinreb, M.P., M. Jamieson, N. Fulton, Y. Chen, J.X. Johnson, C. Smith,
Bremer, and J. Baucom, 1997: Operational Calibration of GOES-8 and -9
Imagers and Sounders. |
## GOES Real-Time ImageryGeostationary Satellite Server ## Routine Operational InformationOperational GOES-West Transition Plan (PDF) User Information and Documents ## GOES Orbital Elements## Additional GOES InformationNOAA's Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere |