Operational Calibration of the Imagers and Sounders
on the GOES-8 and -9 Satellites, Page 12
Michael Weinreb, Michael Jamieson, Nancy Fulton, Yen Chen, Joy Xie Johnson,
James Bremer, Carl Smith, and Jeanette Baucom
6.2 Relativization
The signal from any scene is the instrument's output while viewing the
scene, minus its output when viewing space. Until the spring of 1996, however,
the data in the visible channels of the GOES-8 and GOES-9 sensors were
transmitted to users in absolute counts, i.e., scene counts without the space
counts subtracted out. In this form, the data were consistent with the
visible-channel data from other NOAA satellites past and present.
The process of differencing the signals from the scene and space is termed "relativization,"
because its outcome is a signal relative to space. Relativization removes
effects of the zero-signal background, long-term drifts, and
detector-to-detector offset differences. For the imagers, relativizing the
signals is usually not important under normal conditions. The outputs of the
photodiode detectors are relatively stable in time and consistent among
detectors. The space clamps continually set the count level from space at
approximately 29 counts, thereby preventing significant drifts caused by
temperature changes. And there are no detectable drifts from 1/f noise in the
visible channels. For a single detector, the rms variation in space-clamp levels
("clamp noise") is less than one count (out of 1024), and the variability in the
space-clamp level among detectors is of the order of one count.
However, some relatively rare performance anomalies in the imagers have provided a reason to
relativize. Before the spring of 1996, the visible imagery from both imagers
experienced occasional incidents of severe striping, which consisted of positive
or negative offsets, between 10 and 30 counts in magnitude, in the outputs of
one of the eight detectors. The cause is believed to be noise spikes in the
space clamps of the offending detector. Furthermore, for a few days around the
equinoxes, the space clamp level of physical detector 6 of the GOES-9 imager's
visible-channel array was observed to increase by approximately five counts for
a few hours of the day, which also caused image striping. Relativization should
prevent such anomalies from causing stripes in the images. Relativization would
also be of benefit for the sounders. Because they do not clamp on space, their
outputs show diurnal and seasonal drifts and detector-to-detector variations,
tens of counts (out of 8192) in magnitude.
Table 4. Dates relativization was first enabled
| Instrument |
Date |
| Space |
Imager |
5/23/96 |
| Sounder |
6/19/96 |
| Blackbody |
Imager |
4/16/96 |
| Sounder |
4/16/96 |
Therefore, in the spring of 1996 (see Table 4), relativization of the
visible-channel imagery from the imagers and sounders was made operational. The
data are relativized before being normalized. Relativization requires two steps.
First, the mean count value from the most recent space look is subtracted from
the pixel counts. (For the imager, the space-look data are from the post-clamp
following the preceding space look.) Second, a constant count level, X0, is
added back in. Without the second step, relativization would have two
undesirable consequences. First, when space itself is the target, the
distribution of the data would be approximately Gaussian with a mean of zero.
Half of the distribution would have count values less than zero and would be
lost, since GVAR (the GOES VARiable format data stream, which users receive)
will not accommodate negative integers. Second, the overall brightness of the
image would change significantly between the "relativization off" and
"relativization on" states.
For all eight visible-channel detectors of all
imagers, the value of X0 is 29. For all four visible-channel detectors of all
sounders, the value of X0 is 920. Since these are the nominal values for the
space-count levels in the absence of relativization, there is hardly any change
in overall image brightness between the "relativization off" and "relativization
on" states.
At first glance, it may seem that the two steps of relativization
would cancel each other out. This is not the case, however, because the mean
space value and X0 are not necessarily equal. The mean space-count level varies
from space look to space look, as it is affected by noise (imager) or noise and
drift (sounder), whereas X0 is invariant.
Next | Previous | Table of Contents
Contact Michael P. Weinreb at michael.weinreb@noaa.gov
Latest Revision: July 9, 1997